Gerald’s Game

When sex games go wrong

It’s hard to find a good horror film based around Valentine’s; a search through Netflix yielded little, until a trailer for a romantic getaway gone wrong.

Gerald’s Game, based on the novel by Stephen King, brings little when it comes to gore but plays big psychologically.

The story begins with Jessie and husband Gerald driving to their holiday home to rekindle their marriage; they almost hit a stray dog along the way, and Gerald refuses to go back for it.

At the home, dear husband has had the house cleaned and stocked with food – the pair won’t be bothered all weekend; Jessie cuts up $200 meat to feed the poor dog in the woods. Gerald is eager to get things moving along, leading his wife inside and, for some reason, leaving the door wide open.

Jessie’s bought a brand new slip nightie for the special event, so new she almost leaves the tag on. Ripping it off, she hides it on the shelf above the bed before choosing her alluring position on the sheets; Gerald has popped a viagra and leaves the glass of water on the shelf, too, and then surprises her with a set of handcuffs.

Restrained to the bedposts, Jessie begins to panic when her husband begins to play out a rape scenario; past trauma catches up with her and she tells him to stop, and he berates her for now ruining the weekend before suddenly dropping dead on top of Jessie.

Jessie manages to push Gerald off the end of the bed, and if he hadn’t died from the heart attack he’s now dead from the blow to the head. In a panic, Jessie screams for five hours for help.

Remember the door they left open? In strolls that hungry dog, sniffing out Gerald’s corpse for a meal; Jessie tries to scare it away, but it takes a chunk out of him.

Should have taken in the dog, Gerald. Also, erectile dysfunction happens to guys who hate dogs.

To her surprise, Gerald suddenly gets up, only to quickly discover that she’s hallucinating; Gerald is still dead on the floor and this version of him is quick to berate her for wasting so much time screaming for help, as well as blaming her for their marriage problems. I’m left to wonder if it’s just her subconscious beating her down, or if Gerald was actually emotionally abusive when he was alive.

Jessie finally manages to slip out of the cuffs and turns to gloat to her husband, yet she’s still trapped on the bed – another hallucination caused by dehydration. The three of them discuss things Jessie never wanted to face – such as her sleepwalking that Gerald never seemed to notice – and the hallucinations remind her that there’s a glass of water above her; she manages to get it down but can’t bring it close enough to drink. Gerald says to her again that he liked her slip, reminding her that she has the tag on the shelf, too; she uses that as a straw to drink with.

Jessie falls asleep, but is woken again in the night by the dog, she sees what looks like Lurch’s cousin standing in a dark corner with a bag full of bones and jewelry; Jessie closes her eyes again and exclaims that he’s not real, Gerald claims the figure is death coming to get her and begins to call her ‘Mouse’ – this reminds her of a time when she was younger.

A flashback dream shows twelve year old Jessie arrive at a cabin by the lake with her family to watch the eclipse; her dad is the one who affectionately calls her ‘Mouse’, and she’s very much a daddy’s girl. Young Jessie doesn’t want to go out on the boat with the rest of the family, so she and dad stay behind; he says he misses when she sat on his knee when she was younger, she offers to sit on his knee and he masturbates while she watches the eclipse.

Bare shoulders are kinky to a pervert!

Jessie wakes again in pain from her cut off circulation and cramp in her legs. The two hallucinations are skeptical about the secret she kept for all those years not being a burden to her marriage – despite marrying a man just like her father. Jessie’s dad apologised for what he did, but manipulated her into keeping a secret. There are some suggestions later that he may have taken things further with her, using handcuffs.

Gerald teases Jessie about the figure he calls ‘the man made of moonlight’, pointing out a bloody footprint on the floor; when she denies he’s real, Gerald points out that the dog left around the same time the figure appeared.

Other Jessie reminds her of the event after the eclipse, when she sat down to dinner with family and broke a glass from holding it too tight; she’d cut her hand, leading to Jessie planning her escape with the hallucination version of herself helping her through it. She manages to break the glass against the shelf and cut her own wrist to slip free, but almost completely skins her hand in the process.

Jessie drags the bed to the bathroom to unlock her other hand, then fashions a bandage out a sanitary pads before trying to phone for help; her phone is dead and there doesn’t seem to be a landline. Jessie passes out next to Gerald’s body and wakes later to see his face half eaten; as she escapes, she meets the man made of moonlight and offers her ring to him and taking off in the car – he suddenly appears in the back and she crashes into a tree. A couple in a house nearby find her and save her.

Six months later, she’s writing a letter to her younger self, explaining she feigned amnesia to the police to avoid recalling the situation, and she’d set up a foundation for victims of sexual abuse with Gerald’s life insurance. She’s also had several skin grafts on her hand.

It also turns out that Lurch’s cousin was real afterall: a murderer, grave robber and collector of bones who also eats the faces of male corpses – Jessie thought it had been the dog.

A face only a mother could love

She goes the trial of the man made of moonlight; when they comes face to face he exclaims ‘you’re not real’, letting the viewers know he had been in the house all along; Jessie sees her dad and Gerald in him and states ‘you’re so much smaller than I remember’ before walking out to get on with her life.

Gerald’s Game is a slow paced film, concentrating on the trauma Jessie suffered through as a child to help her overcome her current situation; however, it’s told well and the hallucinations of herself and her husband help to keep things from getting too boring.

3.5/5: For the slow pace and lack of gore.

Child’s Play: 1988 vs 2019

For reference, when I mention Chucky in this article I’m referring to the 1988 version, as Chucky is Charles Lee Ray; for the 2019 remake, I’ll refer to Chucky as Buddi, his brand.

When I heard about the Child’s Play reboot, I was skeptical. I heard the original creators had plans to make Child’s Play Classic into a TV series – although I’m not sure on the progress with that – and wondered how a 2019 version could follow in the footsteps of our favourite killer doll.

Personally, I find it lacks what Classic Child’s Play’s main theme was about: a soul.

For those unfamiliar with the Classic, Child’s Play centers around Charles Lee Ray who voodoo’s his soul into a Good Guy doll after being injured in a botched robbery; that Good Guy doll ends up in the hands of innocent Andy, and Chucky’s mission from there is to transfer his soul back into a human vessel. He also happens to kill everyone who gets in his way.

Reboot Child’s Play can be summed up in one picture…

‘There’s ya problem!’

What I love about Chucky is how well he’s designed and made for a 1988 film. It was the early stages of animatronics thanks to Disney, and they hadn’t been as fine tuned as they are now; deeper research led me to facts such as: it took three people to work the expressions of Chucky’s face. The jaw movement itself was fascinating, revealing how fluid movement was with precise timing with joysticks on the lip movement, combined with the engineer wired up to mimic jaw movement.

The man with the chin strap controls Chucky’s jaw movement

You can tell a lot of love went into each Chucky that they had to use for filming. Movement was allowed to be a little janky because it was a doll, but not so much that it would cause problems in filming. Things couldn’t be fixed with CGI back then.

The Behind the Scenes footage is fantastic to watch, do see for yourself below!

Of course, I don’t mean to insult the creators of Buddi. Technology has come a long way since Chucky, and I imagine there were some restraints on Buddi’s design (due to the tv series); however, the design doesn’t fit in with 2019 technology – or further beyond that with Kaslan’s AI tech that does everything for you. Scenes where the doll may fumble are quick fixes with CGI.

Is Buddi creepy? Yes, but in more of a design that will give children nightmares – ironic as it’s a doll meant for kids; I can’t imagine any parent would look at Buddi and think it’s a suitable look for kids to enjoy; a Good Guy doll looks sweet and innocent, which is why no one would suspect Chucky of anything, but Buddi looks like Hannibal Lecter and Joker’s love-child.

Red eyes are a giveaway, dude.

There are also some scenes where he looks like a giant bobble head toy.

Let’s talk about the Andys for a moment. Chucky’s Andy looks to be at the age Good Guy was designed for (7 or 8?), the pair are roughly the same size and Chucky’s attachment to Andy is that he has a good, young body to swap into before the doll becomes human.

Awww, twins!

Buddi seemed to be advertised around that same age as well, and maybe even up to 10; however, Andy here looks to be a (pre?)teen, towering above Buddi like and older brother trying to help their toddler sibling walk. I can’t imagine why a teenager would want a Buddi – because it connects to the wifi? Because it’s voice activated? I get that Andy has just moved, is a little lonely and hasn’t made friends yet, but give him some time – not a kids toy! Also, Buddi’s attachment to Andy is simply friendship via a deleted protocol in his programme; it’s a jealous toddler with a kitchen knife.

Speaking of knives…

I find that another flaw with Buddi is his kills. He’s linked to Kaslan like E.T and, towards the end of the film, mostly inflicts harm with products that are linked to Kaslan; it hits too heavy on the ‘evil AI’ theory that people obsessed about for decades. I get it, technology has flaws, but Buddi’s flaw only happened because some guy in China didn’t like being told how to do his job. The Child’s Play image of a killer doll with a knife is only there because Buddi decided ‘monkey see, monkey do’; the kids actively teach him to stab someone, his altered AI concluded that was a good thing, something else to please Andy with.

Chucky, on the other hand, has more creative flair in his work; he’s human, so he can plot and execute and no one would suspect him because he’s a cute little doll – that’s the scary aspect of Chucky, he will make everyone else think you’re insane for pointing the finger at him – he will lay in wait and strike when he’s ready. A knife is easier for Chucky for obvious reasons, but he’s blown up vehicles, pushed people out of windows, used various tools over the years to get what he wants; there’s a charm to Chucky while he does things and that makes him a villian you want to love.

Nailed it!

My final nitpick is the lore. Chucky is a human soul trapped in a doll, the more times he’s destroyed and rebuilt the longer he will live; Buddi’s makes less sense, the Buddi line is recalled and tested, surely then his broken AI would be fixed and his switch flipped back to good – so how can he exist further as evil?

In conclusion…

I get it!

Did I hate 2019 Child’s Play? No. Did I like it? Also no. If the 2019 reboot didn’t have Child’s Play attached to it it would be an ok film and an interesting twist on our killer doll; it had potential, but it was ruined with a bad design and a lazy ‘killer AI linked to everything’ plot.

In an actual battle between Chucky and Buddi, my money is firmly on Charles Lee Ray.